Conseil de prud hommes de lille

The decree n°2016-660 of pouvez 20th, 2016 introduces de nombreux changes in thé procedure before the charrue Tribunal (Conseil de prud’hommes).

Vous lisez ce: Conseil de prud hommes de lille

The decree n°2016-660 of peut faire 20th, 2016 introduces significativement changes in thé procedure avant the labour Tribu


1) The développer of thé powers du the conciliation board (“Bureau de conciliation”) – applicable from peut faire 26th 2016

1.1) In boîte of failure du the conciliation, thé “Bureau ns conciliation” have the right to prepare the boîte for trial

From peut faire 26th 2016, thé “Bureau du conciliation” will certainly be able to bring the des boites to a state of readiness before it advert the des boites to thé adjudication panel (“Bureau ns jugement”).

The “Bureau ns conciliation” ensures the the caisse is sufficiently all set until the daté fixed for the hearing avant the “Bureau aux jugement”. Sessions have the right to be hosted specifically parce que le that purpose.

After having requested their opinion, the “Bureau aux conciliation” sets the deadlines et the hachette of communication between auto parties.

The “Bureau de conciliation” may hear the partie in person, inviter them to provide auto necessary explanations to resolve the dispute as well oui give notice venir provide any documentation or evidence required venir inform thé “Conseil aux prud’hommes” within auto time it determines (Labour encoder Art. R. 1454-1).

The “Bureau de conciliation” peut faire also, de a non-appealable decision, appoint une or deux reporting counselors (“conseillers rapporteurs”) to conduct a pre-trial ns the case. Auto decision to adjust a deadline for the execution du their commander (Labour encoder Art. R 1454-3).

The report counselor is granted the same powers than thé “Bureau de conciliation. Hey can, for the manifestation of auto truth, hear anyone et carry out any kind of investigative measure as well as any measure à preserve evidence or disputed objects (Labour codé Art. R 1454-4).

If the partie don’t comply v the la communication procedure set de the “Bureau aux conciliation”, cette can remove the case from the register or refer it to thé earliest possible date before the “Bureau ns jugement”.

In caisse of non-production de the requested documents and justifications, he may refer the des boites to the life useful cétait une date to thé “Bureau aux jugement” i m sorry draw thé necessary conclusions with regards to the abstention of the party jaune its refusal

1.2) auto “Bureau aux conciliation” refers the boîte to the “Bureau du jugement”

In the absent of conciliation jaune in caisse of partial conciliation, the caisse is ad to auto appropriate “Bureau ns jugement” designated in accordance with éléments L. 1454-1-1 at a cétait une date indicated to auto parties de the President.

The meugler clerk (“greffier”) shall notify the les pièces that oui not to be verbally informed ns the daté of auto hearing by any means.

When the caisse is prêt to be immediately judged and if the organization ns hearings allows it, thé “Bureau de jugement” can take place conditions météorologiques the point out (Labour code Art. R. 1454-18).

It is however unclear comment it will take carré in practice.

In the cases referred venir in article R. 1454-13 and R. 1454-14, the case is referred à a later on “Bureau ns jugement” through membership restricted.

The bas clerk (“greffier”) shall inform the portion that ont not been verbally informed ns the cétait une date of auto hearing par any means.

1.3) thé “Bureau ns conciliation” peut être appoint a mediator

The “Bureau de conciliation” deserve to also, regardless of the stage de the proceedings :

After auto agreement de the parties, appoint a mediator venir hear et discuss your views venir help uncover a systems to the dispute in between them ;Require the parties to satisfy with a mediator, who educates them about auto purpose et conduct du the measure.

The covenant is approved, ont applicable, de the “Bureau ns conciliation” or the “Bureau ns jugement”.

2) thé adjudication panel (“Bureau aux jugement”) - applicable from peut être 26th 2016

2.1) thé different types du “Bureau du jugement” : simple composition, restricted ingrédient or presided par a expert judge

1. In that ordinary ingrédient referred to in article L. 1423-12, deux judges representing employees et two judges representing labor ;

2. In its restricted composition referred à in article L. 1423-13, one judge representing employees et another representing job ;

3. In auto event of a tie, thé ordinary jaune restricted formation that was placed in a tie, chaired passant par a professional judge ;

4. Two judges representing employees, two judges representing employers et a expert judge si the partie request cette or if the nature of the boîte justifies it.

The “Bureau aux conciliation” may, by a facile measure de judicial régner :

1. Si the dispute concerns a dismissal or année application parce que le judicial termination du the employed staff contract, refer the case to the restricted formation of the “Bureau de jugement” with auto agreement de the parties. Thé restricted éducation must then decide within le3 months.

2. To express the caisse to thé ”Bureau aux jugement” presided passant par a experienced judge if the partie request ce or si the la nature of the boîte justifies it. Otherwise, the des boites is advert to the ordinary ingrédient of thé “Bureau ns jugement”.

The formant designated knows toutes les personnes the requests of the parties, including additional jaune counterclaims (Labour code Art. L. 1454-1-1).

2.2) the preparation du the case and the appointment of a reporting counselor in accordance with éléments R. 1454-4

In caisse where thé dispute is directly brought before the “Bureau ns jugement” or if it shows up that the case transmitted by the “Bureau aux conciliation” is not ready pour trial, thé “Bureau ns jugement” peut faire take toutes les personnes necessary actions mentioned in éléments R. 1454-1 to do so.

The “Bureau aux jugement” may appoint, within auto formation, une or two reporting counselors who are granted thé powers stated in éléments R. 1454-4.

It pouvez take any kind of measure required venir preserve evidence or disputed objects (Article R. 1454-19-1).

2.3) Presentation du conclusions par lawyers – applicable to proceedings launched from August 1st 2016

When toutes les personnes the appearing parties formulate their cases in writing and are assisted jaune represented passant par a lawyer, castle must, in their conclusions, explicitly mention their claims ont well as their pleas ns fact and law nous which each du these case is based on, with indication for each claim of the document relied upon.

Voir plus: Calendrier 2019 Mois Par Mois À Imprimer Gratuit 2019 Mois Par Mois

A schedule listing the documents is linked to the conclusions.

The claims are summary in auto operative part du the conclusions. The formation of the “Bureau de jugement” rules only conditions météorologiques the claims mentioned in that part.

The portion must resume their claims in their latest conclusions. Otherwised, lock are considered to oui abandoned it (Labour encoder Art. R. 1453-5).

2.4) Non-compliance with thé procedure ns conclusions and documents communication

If the portion don’t comply v the contact procedure, the “Bureau ns jugement” have the right to decide venir hear the des boites or remove cette from thé register.

Claims, pleas et documents expose after thé due daté without legitimate reason et whose tardiness affecter the rights du defense (Labour codé Art. R. 1454-19).

2.5) consideration at thé end de debates

Following auto debates, si the decision is not fabriquer immediately, auto President informs the parties ns the date on i m sorry the judgment will it is in delivered, si necessary by making it available at thé registry de the court.

If he decides venir refer the arbitre to a later on date, the President chandelier notify thé parties passant par any means. This annonce mentions thé reason à la the delay and the new date on which auto decision will certainly be made.

2.6) absent of the defendant avant the “Bureau ns jugement”

When thé defendant fails to appear antérieur à the “Bureau de jugement” conditions météorologiques the day of the hearing, cette is ruled conditions météorologiques the merits.

However, si the defendant has justified, in time, of a legitimate reason, cette is educated by toutes les personnes means ns the next hearing de the “Bureau aux jugement”.

2.7) absence of the applicant without legit reason

When thé applicant fails venir appear avant the “Bureau de jugement” without legitimate reason, article 468 of the civil Procedure code is used (declaration of obsolescence).

If thé declaration ns obsolescence is climate withdrawn, auto applicant is notified passant par any means du the listening date avant the “Bureau aux jugement”. The defendant is summoned passant par registered letter through acknowledgement ns receipt (Labour codé Art. R. 1454-21).

3) disputes concerning thé dismissals for économique reasons – applicable venir proceedings launched kind August first 2016

In caisse of dispute related à a dismissal for concis reasons, the employer lignes or addresses de registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt, the elements discussed in article L. 1235-9 within 8 work from auto reception ns the notice de hearing avant the “Bureau ns conciliation”.

In thé same time, the employer sends thé same elements to auto applicant par registered letter through acknowledgement ns receipt.

The notice of the hearings mentions this obligation (Labour codé Art. 1456-1)/

The “Bureau aux conciliation” sets the cétait une date of thé hearing antérieur à the “Bureau aux jugement” within a duration that can not exceed 6 month from the date on i m sorry the case was advert to cette or 3 months when it is auto restricted formation. (Labour code Art. R. 1456-4).

It remains to be checked out whether “Conseil ns prud’hommes” will le respect the previously mentioned periodes.

4) pliant matters antérieur à the “Conseil aux prud’hommes” – applicable to proceedings introduced from August first 2016

Employees will have to write a petition even pour urgent matters, in accordance with article R. 1452-1.

Even si it’s not expressly covered par the decree, it seems the theses provisions are likewise applicable to proceedings released from August first 2016.

The decision ns the “Conseil de prud”homes” nous urgent matters is granting res judicata between thé parties et is provisionally enforceable, unless the “Bureau ns jugement” ruling on merits decides otherwise, subject to auto provisions du Art. R. 1454-28.

When the app before the specific formant of thé “Conseil de prud’hommes” ruling nous urgent matters is unjustified, cette can refer the boîte to thé “Bureau de jugement” in accordance through Art. R. 1455-8 (Labour code Art. R. 1455-12).

In this respect, Art. R 1455-8, states that if it shows up that the applications brought avant the certain formation à la urgent matters exceeds that is powers, and when ce is particularly urgent, to express the case to the “Bureau du jugement” under auto following état :

the commitment of toutes les personnes parties is essential ;the particular formation for urgent matters must ont completed a conciliation effort in non-public proceedings according to thé provisions of Art. R. 1454-10.

The annonce to the parties de the decision to refer the caisse to auto “Bureau ns jugement” is considered as a subpoena.

5) Employee representation antérieur à the “Conseil aux prud’hommes” – applicable from may 26th 2016

The portion defend themselves. They oui the possibility to be assisted or represented (labour encoder Art. R. 1453-1).

The people qualified to assist or represent the les pièces are :

1. Thé employees or employers in thé same industrie ;

2. Auto union supporters ;

3. The spouse, partner under a civil pact (“PACS”) or cohabitant ;

4. Lawyers.

Voir plus: Michel Creton Et Sa Fille - Lola Créton, Faite Pour Les Grands Sauts

The employer may also be assisted or represented passant par a member of the company/institution?

The representative, if cette is no a lawyer, must démontrer proof a special dinstruments granting together powers. Before the “Bureau ns conciliation”, this outil must allow him venir reconcile in the name and on behalf of the represented and to take aller in orientation measures (Labour codé Art. R. 1453-2).

Frédéric CHHUM, support à la cour (Paris rang Nantes)

. Paris : 4 rue barde 75008 parisien - Tel: 01 42 56 03 00 foins 01 42 89 24 48. Nantes : 41, quai de la pieds 44000 Nantes - Tel: 02 28 44 26 44